7 Comments
User's avatar
Seattle Ecomodernist Society's avatar

Mostly according to Frederick Starr the India-central Asia-Europe intellectual area developed independently from the Chinese intellectual area, at least in terms of science and scholarship. Is the rise of global prosperity and the study and translation of Classical Chinese texts leading to a reintegration of separate historic scholarly thought? Is this likely to trigger a burst of synergistic advance in various knowledge domains? If generative AI develops wider and different learning source data might it also push similar synergy and acceleration?

Rahulism's avatar

Looking forward to it.

International Finance Review's avatar

Read the article, looking forward to reading about your journey into Chinese history, literature, and your learnings. If you’d like I’d be happy to introduce you to Admiral Bill Owens who was commander of the Sixth Fleet (former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) and spent much of his career working with China, understands it well, and has many friends in the region. He was also on the Wipro board and is a proponent of both cultures.

Rajesh Kasturirangan's avatar

That might be the nicest thing someone has said on my Substack. I would love an introduction to Bill Owens.

International Finance Review's avatar

I’m at +91-98126-12345 on whatsapp and cmd@goldsteinroth.com shoot me a whatsapp and I’ll set up a zoom call for both of you 😊

Gaslight Phoenix's avatar

Hi. This is a very confused and ornery article.