Ranganaut · December 2020

T2B30: Cliden 3

Newslet

Today’s newslet is an advertisement for an event I am helping organize

I am a member of an Animal Rights group called - wait for it - Animal Left. I am really excited to invite you to our first Animaleft seminar next Monday, December 14 at 7:30 PM IST/9:00 AM EST. I am moderating a very distinguished panel:

If you’re interested, register here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfrPwkeKWgwtSioIe4BCsaz-aWW7WkZ5yW3qyLkQrjo4tVrzg/viewform?usp=sf_link

Also, share widely!

Share

The Kennedy School of Climate

Being a self-advertisement, today’s newslet is the main feature and the feature is a teaser for what’s to come

Biden’s hiring choices show continuities as well as differences from Obama’s. Obama hired Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff, a man who once:

supposedly called liberals planning to press conservative Democrats to support publicly financed health insurance "fucking retards."

Biden’s Chief of Staff Ron Klain has a much warmer relationship with progressives and is seen kindly by the climate movement. From the Intercept:

Klain, while not himself a fire-breathing Sanders supporter, has always been respectful to the party’s left flank. (He is also known for a heightened level of organizational competence, a rather important trait in a pandemic.) Biden’s alternative, his close adviser Steve Ricchetti, a longtime corporate lobbyist, was passed over for the job amid progressive opposition.

Notice this Twitter thread that starts with a message from Varshini Prakash, the founder of the Sunrise Movement

Tweet by @VarshPrakash

and then Ron Klain retweets that message with a teaser (presumably something to do with a domestic Climate Czar):

Tweet by @RonaldKlain

Given his pedigree, and especially given his organizational competence, I am assuming that Klain prefers techno-managerial solutions to the climate crisis that don’t address alienation from nature and the vigilance needed to rectify that alienation.

I call that the Kennedy School of Climate, and wouldn’t be surprised if Harvard opens such a school in the next five years.

The KSC approach to climate builds upon existing socio-technical systems in response to the climate crisis, taking for granted that our present state of technical and organizational expertise is good enough — as long as there’s political will, appropriate policy frameworks are in place and competent people run the show.

My job is to take the KSC assumption seriously, present it in its most ambitious form and only after doing so can I probe its flaws. That’s a standard rule of debate in Indian Philosophy called Purvapaksa.

Q: What’s the most ambitious version of the Kennedy School of Climate?

A: It’s an organizational approach to climate.

There are, broadly, two approaches to the climate crisis. OK, three:

  1. The head-in-the-sand approach - pretend it doesn’t exist or we can ignore it because humans aren’t the cause or whatever.

  2. The organizational approach - that climate change will be solved with massive policy interventions, international treaties and cooperation and so on. Within the organizational approach, there’s plenty of room for competition, new business models and even great power rivalry.

  3. The ecological approach - climate change is a call for a dramatic shift in what it is to be human, that we need to move from economy to ecology as the fundamental principle of human existence.

I will give a hint of the ecological approach tomorrow but it feels utopian today - may not be so in thirty years!